| 1) Growth and the mTOR pathway
How is growth controlled at the level or the organism, organ and individual cell? Even within Homo sapiens, overall body size can vary widely (see an extreme example; image below, left panel). The mTOR pathway is known to play an important role in cell growth control. An example of such regulation can be seen in overexpression of Rheb in a subset of epidermal cells in Xenopus laevis development (see image below, middle panel). However how overall organ size is determined and the role of mTOR in this process is poorly understood. In postnatal life organ size is generally set within narrow limits and remains proportionate to overall body size. In the case of skeletal or heart muscle, training and exercise can increase overall organ size. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which affects around 1/500 of the population, a pathologic type of ventricular wall growth can occur within the heart (see image below, right panel).
When proliferation and growth are largely coupled during development, the mTOR pathway contributes to setting overall organ size. However what is not known is whether, once size is set, an organ requires continual signaling from mTOR to maintain this size in proportion to body size, or whether this can be manipulated independently of body size. We believe that the use of genetic models of induced loss of mTORC1 components such a Raptor or mTORC1 activators such as the small GTPase Rheb in mice will shed light on this important question.

2) An amino acid requirement for tumours: Achilles heel for cancer?
The biosynthetic requirement for cell growth and proliferation indicates that cancer cells should have an increased avidity for nutrients. The “Warburg effect” indicates cancer cells preferential metabolism of glucose to generate ATP using the relatively inefficient method of glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation, thereby generating lactic acid. To circumvent the inefficient generation of ATP cancer cells are thought to have invoked mechanisms during tumourigenesis that ensure high levels of glucose uptake and flux, thereby generating large amounts of carbon-skeleton intermediates for biosynthesis. This property is used clinically to image cancer in the body using the glucose analogue FDG and PET scanners. Cancer cells are anticipated to be particularly vulnerable to therapeutics that might restrict glycolysis or prevent disposal of lactic acid.
Nonetheless, some cancers cannot be imaged with FDG-PET, suggesting that they use an alternative energy source that similarly fuels biosynthesis. A likely candidate for such a fuel is the abundant amino acid glutamine. Similar to glucose, glutamine metabolism by glutaminolysis generates carbon-skeleton TCA intermediates for biosynthesis and generates lactic acid, but additionally provides nitrogen groups for nucleotide biosynthesis. In cell culture various cancer cells can be shown to require glutamine for survival and proliferation despite the ample presence of glucose (see images of an ovarian cancer cell line, below).
Glutamine is known to be transported into the cell via the SLC1A5 transporter. Intracellular glutamine stimulates uptake of essential amino acids such as leucine-thereby activating mTORC1- via SLCA7, a co-transporter which effluxes intracellular glutamine and imports leucine. Losing glutamine from the cell to maintain mTORC1 signaling seems counterintuitive as glutamine is also rapidly metabolized to glutamate during glutaminolysis by the mitochondrial phosphate-dependant glutaminase. We are interested in how cancer cells utilize glutamine and how is this related to growth control and mTORC1.

+GLUTAMINE -GLUTAMINE
|